Edwyrd theurj Burj
  • Male
  • United States

Edwyrd theurj Burj's Friends

  • Gregory Desilet
  • Ambo Suno
  • Joseph Camosy
  • Eva Fidjeland
  • Michael Gray
  • Bruce Kunkel
  • Joel Morrison
  • BrightAbyss~
  • William Harryman
  • Kerry Jikishin Dugan
  • shaman sun
  • Lol
  • Joseph
  • Mary W.
  • Christophe

Edwyrd theurj Burj's Discussions

Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
1 Reply

I just discovered this Journal by the above name and it's open access. It's a relatively new emerging field that is rapidly…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Edwyrd theurj Burj 7 hours ago.

Collective Enlightenment Through Postmetaphysical Eyes
7 Replies

The paper Michel Bauwens and I wrote to be in the next issue of…Continue

Started this discussion. Last reply by Edwyrd theurj Burj on Thursday.

On the modes, amodality, supramodality and plurimodality

I posted this initially in …Continue

Started Jun 10

The implications and explications of 'the fold'

Related to my thread on the fold, Balder (Bruce) and I had this…Continue

Started May 19

Gifts Received

Gift

Edwyrd theurj Burj has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Edwyrd theurj Burj's Page

Latest Activity

Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
"The inaugural issue of the Journal gives a good overview of the emerging field."
7 hours ago
Edwyrd theurj Burj posted a discussion

Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

I just discovered this Journal by the above name and it's open access. It's a relatively new emerging field that is rapidly expanding. The first issue of the Journal (2011) gives an overview. This Psychology Today article provides some interesting material. It provides 3 guiding principles for the transition to…See More
10 hours ago
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Collective Enlightenment Through Postmetaphysical Eyes
"Now also here."
Thursday
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"The link for the last post is here. The following is from this link: "Hierarchical organization is a corner stone of complexity and multifractality constitutes its central quantifying concept. For model uniform cascades the corresponding…"
Monday
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"The crux of the issue is that monofractals are symmetrically self-similar at each iteration. Multifractals are not. Multifractals weave 2 or more fractals which each iterate differently creating asymmetry. Which is indeed the case with natural…"
Monday
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"As I have no math background this is difficult for me to understand when that language is used. So I've been looking around for some basic introductions to the topic to get the gist. I found this series to be helpful. In the link it relates…"
Jun 18
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"Cory: Compare with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale_invariance Me: I did. While fractals might have self-similar scaling, multifractals have "multiple scaling factors at play at once." So when you have several fractals interacting…"
Jun 18
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"Sara: I don’t have time to get into this but just based on what you wrote below, calculating the fractal dimension (fd) of (usually large-sized) sample data over time to test for a power law is “one thing” (let’s say apples)…"
Jun 18
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"Some further comments: Me: Some of the references I've provided show that cognitive functioning, and natural phenomenon generally, operate via multifractal cascades, not linear, repeated, monofractal similarities. The latter are an imposition…"
Jun 18
DavidM58 replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Object-oriented ontology
"The Guardian has a new "long read" about T. Morton, OOO, and the concept of The Anthropocene. Excerpt: "It is through hyperobjects that we initially confront the Anthropocene, Morton argues. One of his most influential books, itself…"
Jun 15
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"Here are some references Sara Ross of the AD Forum gave me: Ross, S. N.  & Ware, K.  (2013). Hypothesizing the body's genius to trigger and self-organize its healing: 25 years using a standardized neurophysics therapy.…"
Jun 14
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"I also posted this on the Adult Development Forum: Some of the references I've provided show that cognitive functioning, and natural phenomenon generally, operate via multifractal cascades, not linear, repeated, monofractal similarities. The…"
Jun 14
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion Real and false reason
"Continuing thispost (and several following on the next page), this article reiterates my original inquiry. E.g.: "Simple, straightforward linear models can exhibit the celebrated 'self-similarity' of fractals, that is, the similarity…"
Jun 13
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion States, stages, the WC lattice and the fold
"Commons said in message 24: "That is why he is transitional to metasystematic. He is at step5 in Sara's and my scheme. He has smashed together the elements and is making some hits and lots of overgeneralizations." FYI, see…"
Jun 12
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion States, stages, the WC lattice and the fold
"Back in '09 I started a thread at the Yahoo Adult Development forum by asking these questions: "Just curious, has anyone done hierarchical complexity testing on the AQAL model itself to validate its self-proclaimed status as a…"
Jun 12
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Edwyrd theurj Burj's discussion States, stages, the WC lattice and the fold
"Also see this Yahoo Adult Development thread on states and stages. One has to expand the messages with the arrows to see them all. My post in message 34 follows: Herb Koplowitz wrote:"I would now say that the states that spiritual…"
Jun 12

Edwyrd theurj Burj's Photos

Loading…

Comment Wall (9 comments)

You need to be a member of Integral Post-Metaphysical Spirituality to add comments!

Join Integral Post-Metaphysical Spirituality

At 6:27pm on September 27, 2010, Balder said…
LOL, hmm, I like the sound of that. I don't think so. Just was checking out what they're up to. Seems like it's pretty basic, not really touching much of what we explore here (that I can tell from the discussion).
At 6:21pm on September 27, 2010, Balder said…
There's an interfaith ministry program in New York called One Spirit that has recently opened a program to train people to be "integral spiritual mentors and ministers," led by Lynne Feldman and Joanne Ruben. There was a webinar today on this, which is just winding up.
At 2:08pm on March 26, 2010, shaman sun said…
Would be happy to discuss Gebser, thank you for the link! I'll post something up shortly.
At 2:26pm on March 24, 2010, Lol said…
no more so than anyone having an attachment to 'the end of enlightenment', or to the theory of hierarchical complexity ; ) ...no, i guess i'm trying to see if the state of dzogchen can be regarded differently, as something other than a metaphysical, transcendental 'given' -- i can't see any 'absolute giveness' inherent in the idea of infinite potentiality manifesting out of openess.
At 1:07pm on March 24, 2010, Lol said…
thanks for the link to the transpersonal psychology thread, and it's good to be talking about this with you now, because i wasn't able to raise this at the time. your posts then quoting Capriles were in reference to the pre-trans fallacy, and on having a look at the time at Beyond Mind 2, i came across the part i quoted in my previous message, which at the time made me think of your premise that the so called primordial or non-dual state (rigpa) was nothing more than, as you concisely put it, the state of pre-reflexive awareness integrated with the later ego. attempting to put jargon aside as much as possible, the dzogchen teaching distinguishes between the 'base-of-all' consciousness (kun.zhi nam.shes, a la yogachara, which doesn't automatically imply being present to/in rigpa -- i.e. one can rest in a half-asleep state of a base level of awareness without being in "instant presence") and the 'state of dzogchen', which is the inseparability of kun.zhi (here a different kind/meaning of 'kun.zhi') and rigpa. i'm hoping we don't end up again simply agreeing to differ...i'm wondering rather if you might consider that the kind of half-asleep awareness we can have when meditating, which can be running on automatic, is itself not apart from the ego - in fact the self/ego might be distractedly musing on something within this drowsy state - but from the point of view of the dzogchen teaching it is not the "instant presence" of (or being "instantly present in") the so called non-dual state. kind regards, best wishes.
At 2:53pm on March 23, 2010, Lol said…
hi theurj...can't find the relevant threads/posts now, but vis a vis your proposition that the so called natural/non-dual state is nothing more than the baseline, zero level of hierarchical complexity (my words not yours, as i can't quote you directly, but i'm hoping you'll accept them as adequately capturing your intended meaning), what do you think of the notion that this baseline/zero level might be better represented by "...the state known as base-of-all or kunzhi (kun gzhi) … as manifest when one cozily remains in the experience of the inner luminosity of dang (gdangs) energy known as tingsel (gting gsal)24 without reGnizing this luminosity (a reGnition that would turn it into an instance of the dharmakaya)" (Capriles: Beyond Mind 2 p.5), rather than the so called non-dual state of "instant presence" itself?
At 3:23pm on March 20, 2010, Joseph said…
Hi Edward

I just went back into an email you sent me from 2 years ago and requested to join the KW meetup group. So I haven't been yet but hope to check it out soon.

joseph
At 4:11pm on March 18, 2010, Mary W. said…
Ningbat: LOL!
At 3:34pm on March 18, 2010, Mascha said…
Hi again, Edward. :D
 
 
 
What paths lie ahead for religion and spirituality in the 21st Century? How might the insights of modernity and post-modernity impact and inform humanity's ancient wisdom traditions? How are we to enact, together, new spiritual visions – independently, or within our respective traditions – that can respond adequately to the challenges of our times?

This group is for anyone interested in exploring these questions and tracing out the horizons of an integral post-metaphysical spirituality.

Notice to Visitors

At the moment, this site is at full membership capacity and we are not admitting new members.  We are still getting new membership applications, however, so I am considering upgrading to the next level, which will allow for more members to join.  In the meantime, all discussions are open for viewing and we hope you will read and enjoy the content here.

© 2017   Created by Balder.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service