Participatory Spirituality for the 21st Century
Tags:
Views: 36
A quick addition.
If you listen to somebody like say, Paul Krugman, what you are getting is the academic POV. IOW, he is not a real player. He is like the guy who watches football but can't play the game. Or if he tried, he'd be a bum. :-).
What he really wants to do is debate philosophy, whether he was right all along as a Neo-Keynesian and not from the Chicago School. He waited 30 years for this !
The reason they like Keynes is that is was a real investor. He put his money where is mouth is. Krugman can't do that.
Now Gaddy is a player, that means you have to have a batting average! You have to produce and that's where the problem comes in. And we you need an Umpire, yada yada. But you have to produce.
And now refer to Cicero. ;-)
Gaddy
HI gaddy
I´m a gambler in general, even if I am a good poker and bridge player, given I have a good sense of computing probabilities. As I m not involved in a corrupted system that plays the roulette with people´s money, I don´t have to deal with the ethical problems these bankmen ar burdened with.
I thought they all these bankers were good christians in the pionneer spirit of old America? ahahahah
So If you are angry as you said, fine to be that btw, then so why it is forbidden to "get mad" at illegal settlements in the occupied territories without getting back grotesques lables like neonazi or anything so ridiculous alike?
These AIPAC moffos are manipulating the democratic public sphere, because of their mighty media influences, using an inquisitive language to dismiss any opposite views, all that of course in order to avoid to confront their own contradictions.
Norman Finkelstein, an american jew, a so called history revisionist (what is mainstream history btw? ahhah)
has literally been persecuted by that angry law professor Alan Dershowitz and his campus watch network (a gestapo like organisation actually) because he rejected the so called official narratives on the birh of the State of Israel, by claiming there was a an ethnic cleansing goign on at that time, forcing thousands of palestinians to leave their homes.
Cool inquisitors in a so called great democracy. Very amazing. hahahahah
you tell me.
And: well Milton Friedman or Keynes and their followeres are unfortunately still "ruling" in the field of economics. BTW, this discipline should not gain a status equivalent to physics because it is common knowledge that its models always fail against empirical facts. hahahahha
Gadfly said:A quick addition.
If you listen to somebody like say, Paul Krugman, what you are getting is the academic POV. IOW, he is not a real player. He is like the guy who watches football but can't play the game. Or if he tried, he'd be a bum. :-).
What he really wants to do is debate philosophy, whether he was right all along as a Neo-Keynesian and not from the Chicago School. He waited 30 years for this !
The reason they like Keynes is that is was a real investor. He put his money where is mouth is. Krugman can't do that.
Now Gaddy is a player, that means you have to have a batting average! You have to produce and that's where the problem comes in. And we you need an Umpire, yada yada. But you have to produce.
And now refer to Cicero. ;-)
Gaddy
At the moment, this site is at full membership capacity and we are not admitting new members. We are still getting new membership applications, however, so I am considering upgrading to the next level, which will allow for more members to join. In the meantime, all discussions are open for viewing and we hope you will read and enjoy the content here.
© 2025 Created by Balder. Powered by