integral postmetaphysical enaction

[Edward theurj Berge]

It is with much ado that I change the name of my blog to “integral postmetaphysical enaction” but will keep the same address. The term nonduality is too limited and too attached to certain metaphysical schools of philosophy and religion. Yes, I can recontextualize the term, make it mean whatever I want, but the weight of its historical association is more than my miniscule influence can overcome. On the other hand the term enaction is within the historical context of recent developments in cognitive science yet applicable to all methodologies across the spectrum. Plus it specifically denotes the kind of nonduality in which I'm interested through continuity, both within an individual and between an individual with others and the environment. In AQALese, the integrated and inseparable relations between the one and the many, the inside and the outside. And all within a postmetaphysical, developmental trajectory that dynamically enacts a worldspace, not discovers a universal, given world. It also demonstrates the relation of action and theory, for it is my hope to inspire action in those who read these theoretical ramblings.

 

By the way, I did an internet search on those terms in  parentheses and again it is currently the only link on the web, another first.

 

Here is a good working definition of enaction from Enaction School 2010:

 

“The term enactive is used to identify a way of thinking about, and a set of methodologies for conducting, cognitive science. This approach to describing, explaining and investigating the mind emphasises the valued, meaningful interaction between a living agent and its environment. It emphasises the continuity between the basic processes of living (e.g. metabolism) and cognition. It recognises the autonomy of living systems and the way in which meaning, thought and experience emerge within the dynamic, skilful activity of the agent - the enaction of meaning, thought and experience.

 

“Standing in contrast to much of mainstream thinking within Cognitive Science, the enactive approach challenges many of the basic assumptions of extant theory. The body (including but not limited to the brain) is considered to have an integral role in the processes of the mind. Cognitive processes are seen as the means by which an agent adapts their behavior so as to maintain their values (in the simplest case, biological values such as continued existence but in more complex cases, social and cultural values come into play). The nature of such processes is considered to be dynamic and adaptive, rather than a set of structures that are universal and modular in character.”

[Edward theurj Berge]

Obama's dirty bank deal. This is change we can believe in?

[Edward theurj Berge]

Light's shadow.

[Edward theurj Berge]

Eco-transitions update.

[Edward theurj Berge]

Privileged access revisited.

[Edward theurj Berge]

The new thread is also a post at the blog: OOO. Sounds like a orgasm...

[Edward theurj Berge]

OOO my word!

[Edward theurj Berge]

The greater of two evils. The Democrats definitely suck but the Republicans are far worse, according to the former GOP operative.

[Edward theurj Berge]

The two truths, still?The more things change the more they remain the same...

[Edward theurj Berge]

Lakoff on Obama's jobs speech. Them's fighten' words, I hope.

[Edward theurj Berge]

Feudal capitalism, more a lateral rather than vertical development?

[Edward theurj Berge]

Today's post features infimitas' "essence and identity," duly cited.

[Edward theurj Berge]

Bill Maher on Obama's speech (among other things).

theurj said:

Lakoff on Obama's jobs speech. Them's fighten' words, I hope.