Participatory Spirituality for the 21st Century
Integral Options has a post on the above based on an article by Mark Vernon. Related to a recent IPS theme, Vernon notes the spiritual types cherry pick nice-sounding things from QM but avoid what doesn't fit. He says: "The quantum world is not just a strange place. It’s a hideously violent place too. Spiritualities are wary of celebrating that."
In Harryman's intro he also mentions a Nightline debate involving the topic, with Deepak Chopra and Jean Houston on one side and Michael Shermer and Sam Harris on the other. He thinks the latter fared much better. The link he provides doesn't work but I found it at this link where it can be viewed in its entirety.
I saw this Nightline debate when it first came out, and found it really enjoyable. I too thought that the "atheist-side" came out stronger than the "new age-side" by several orders of magnitude. (As you say, Theurj, especially Harris, Shermer being more the typical been-there-done-that Orange archtype.) Chopra came across to me as a textbook example of how someone with strong samsaric attachments will react in challenging contexts, and Jean Houston, while physically attending, seemed mentally to partake in some wholly other discussion, judging by her ability to mysteriously avoid answering even the most direct and basic questions in a coherent manner.
Yeah, most enjoyable of all is to read what the Youtube audience thinks about Jean Houston's style of argumentation, hehe.
"And unfortunately Harris didn't speak to it, instead focusing on past and present religion with its tribal and ethnocentric focus. He does have opinions on postmetaphysical spirituality like in this thread but it seems he feels he always has to defend against the "old gods" so to speak"
I guess he simply recognizes the fact that it most probably won't make any sense to speak to Amber people about an Orange/Green God or spirituality. (And from what I've heard and seen, the vast majority in America believes in an Amber God, or thinks of God in an Amber fashion.) It will, as Wilber says, go straight over their heads.
That said, this was at Caltech where most of the people are Orange/Green, so that would definitely have been a place to introduce the possibility of a post-Amber (i.e. "future") God or spirituality. But I think he sought to communicate to the people in the sofas watching the debate as well, many of whom were viewing the spectacle through an Amber lens.
Btw, here is the O'Reilly interview with David Silverman. Prime 1st-tier entertainment.
"And Sam Harris is not limited to orange/green."
Oh, sorry if I seemed to imply that. I think Sam definitely demonstrates many of the signs of integral cognition.
They got at or demonstrated, but didn't answer:
The need for methodological complementarity to unite art, science, and spirit.
The separation of mind or consciousness from brain or matter.
How ones framework or viewpoint limits ones openness. No one likes others concepts in a debate.
We need to change or likely be extinct.
New religion or cosmology needs wider awareness to break down tribalism and separateness.