Ken Wilber's Spectrum Model: Identifying Alternative Soteriological Perspectives

I came across the attached essay today and thought it was worth sharing here.

 

I'll copy and paste the introduction, and the rest can be read in the attached PDF file.

 

~*~

 

Ken Wilber’s Spectrum Model: Identifying Alternative Soteriological Perspectives

Leon Schlamm

 

I identify two problematic strands of Ken Wilber’s transpersonal theory. First, I

question Wilber’s claim that his spectrum model is supported by the materials of all

the world’s major mystical traditions. I argue that his integral, hierarchical perspective

privileges some traditions but distorts others. Drawing heavily upon Andrew

Rawlinson’s recent, taxonomic study of mystical traditions, which identifies four

authentic routes to spiritual emancipation (Cool Structured, Cool Unstructred, Hot

Structured and Hot Unstructured), I argue that while Wilber’s model, itself Cool (the

source of spiritual liberation lies within oneself) and Structured (developmental,

hierarchical), provides a valuable cartography of transpersonal structures and states of

consciousness, it cannot adequately handle the materials of the alternative, soteriological

paths of Hot traditions (emphasising the numinous, and as other than oneself) and

of Unstructured traditions (affirming that there can be no gradual, or progressive,

spiritual development at all). Second, and more cursorily, I argue that it is Wilber’s

Cool Structured perspective that informs his categorisation of Jung as an elevationist. I try

to demonstrate that Jung’s psychic model of the conjunction of opposites is a Hot

Structured one, which provides an alternative, soteriological path for persons whose

spiritual needs are different from those addressed by Wilber.

Views: 82

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This inquiry seems right up kela's former alley. I hope he has the time and interest to contribute here, as it would me most interesting.
Yes, I hope he does, too. :-)

theurj said:
This inquiry seems right up kela's former alley. I hope he has the time and interest to contribute here, as it would me most interesting.
labour day is here. (yes, that is a "u" in "labour.") fall is arriving. time to settle in.
i'll find the time. :-)

Reply to Discussion

RSS

What paths lie ahead for religion and spirituality in the 21st Century? How might the insights of modernity and post-modernity impact and inform humanity's ancient wisdom traditions? How are we to enact, together, new spiritual visions – independently, or within our respective traditions – that can respond adequately to the challenges of our times?

This group is for anyone interested in exploring these questions and tracing out the horizons of an integral post-metaphysical spirituality.

Notice to Visitors

At the moment, this site is at full membership capacity and we are not admitting new members.  We are still getting new membership applications, however, so I am considering upgrading to the next level, which will allow for more members to join.  In the meantime, all discussions are open for viewing and we hope you will read and enjoy the content here.

© 2024   Created by Balder.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service