Integral Grammatology, Integral Politics, and the Deficient Mental-Rational

[DavidM58]

No Description

[Balder]

Hi, David, is this a place-holder for something forthcoming?

[DavidM58]

Oh...wow...I wrote a full post about this that has somehow disappeared. It was about this post on Integral Politics and this post on Integral Politics and the Deficient Mental Rational over at The Chrysalis blog.  Check them out.   The primary points of reference on this blog are Rosenstock-Huessy, William Blake, and Jean Gebser.  Rosenstock-Huessy's Cross of Reality is discussed with an interesting take on pronouns, and interesting to compare to Wilber's quadrants. 

Don't know what happened to my original post here.

[Ambo Suno]

Yeah, I read it before it disappeared. Woo woo disappearance.

[DavidM58]

Perhaps I managed to Exceed, which kicked in the enantiadromia pattern, leading to a Withdrawal of the post. 

[Balder]

:-D  I saw "integral grammatology" and thought this thread was referencing my paper.  But it looks like the ideas in the blogs you've linked on The Chrysalsis site are definitely relevant to my project (and others' related projects of experimenting with the pronounal lenses of IT).  I skimmed the blogs and was intrigued, so I will definitely return to them today or tomorrow when I have a little more time.  Thanks for the heads up, David!

[DavidM58]

Yes, Bruce, that is why I included "Integral Grammatology" in the subject title.  In my original post, I stated that I had emailed Scott Preston, the blog author, copies of your last two papers, as well as the one by C.K. ("Emergive Reality"). Here are a couple of the diagrams he uses:

[Balder]

Great, thank you, David.  I will read his blogs soon; they look interesting.