Edward theurj Berge's Discussions (6,956)

Discussions Replied To (6750) Replies Latest Activity

"Actually I think it best to refer to the head of the movement as Kennilingam, the bi…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 17, 2011 to A note on neologisms

178 May 21, 2018
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"Recall above when "someone" said: "But such progress does not move in a line from p…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 17, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"I will compare Torbert to Caputo below. Caputo is defending against the charge of re…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 17, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"Also see Gidley's Appendix A from her lengthy paper "The evolution of consciousness…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 16, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"Balder's IL blog post notes that the future infinitive of TSK is not as something th…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 16, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"In the inaugural issue of Integral Review (June 2005) Torbert has an article called…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 16, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"Now I do have a question about this "intentional attention," since it is apparently…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 16, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"The fourth distinctive feature of DAI (the D in DAI) is the developmental theory use…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 16, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"Integrel Review, in its special issue on politics (6:1, 3/10), printed excerpts of T…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 16, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"Here is a more recent interview with Torbert in the June 2010 issue of ILR. A teaser…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 15, 2011 to Bill Torbert

32 Feb 28, 2014
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

RSS

What paths lie ahead for religion and spirituality in the 21st Century? How might the insights of modernity and post-modernity impact and inform humanity's ancient wisdom traditions? How are we to enact, together, new spiritual visions – independently, or within our respective traditions – that can respond adequately to the challenges of our times?

This group is for anyone interested in exploring these questions and tracing out the horizons of an integral post-metaphysical spirituality.

Notice to Visitors

At the moment, this site is at full membership capacity and we are not admitting new members.  We are still getting new membership applications, however, so I am considering upgrading to the next level, which will allow for more members to join.  In the meantime, all discussions are open for viewing and we hope you will read and enjoy the content here.

© 2026   Created by Balder.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service