Edward theurj Berge's Discussions (6,956)

Discussions Replied To (6750) Replies Latest Activity

"Yes. See this prior post upstream where Bryant mentions Spencer-Brown."

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 2, 2011 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Recall Bryant from this post of 9/30/10 (again, they may have found some new ground…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 2, 2011 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Good find. In his response he notes that OOO might have trouble with the relational…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 2, 2011 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Given my snide remark about defunct, proprietary, intellectual property here I offer…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 1, 2011 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Perhaps Bryant's blog post today might add some clarity, called "Differance." A snip…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 1, 2011 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Yes, please."

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 1, 2011 to Kingdom Come: Postmetaphysical Inclusivism? (My Conference Paper)

87 Nov 1, 2012
Reply by Balder

"I wasn't directing my critique at you Balder but more at those who might dogmaticall…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 1, 2011 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"So now you're a confirmed scholar! Congrats. So do we get to read the final version…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 1, 2011 to Kingdom Come: Postmetaphysical Inclusivism? (My Conference Paper)

87 Nov 1, 2012
Reply by Balder

""formless goo" may be a misrepresentation of Spinoza's substance, at least with rega…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 1, 2011 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Returning to Morton's article that began this thread, part 2 deals with the quantum.…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Nov 1, 2011 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

RSS

What paths lie ahead for religion and spirituality in the 21st Century? How might the insights of modernity and post-modernity impact and inform humanity's ancient wisdom traditions? How are we to enact, together, new spiritual visions – independently, or within our respective traditions – that can respond adequately to the challenges of our times?

This group is for anyone interested in exploring these questions and tracing out the horizons of an integral post-metaphysical spirituality.

Notice to Visitors

At the moment, this site is at full membership capacity and we are not admitting new members.  We are still getting new membership applications, however, so I am considering upgrading to the next level, which will allow for more members to join.  In the meantime, all discussions are open for viewing and we hope you will read and enjoy the content here.

© 2026   Created by Balder.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service