Edward theurj Berge's Discussions (6,956)

Discussions Replied To (6750) Replies Latest Activity

"According to this article: "There are further definitions of rhetoric.... Naming rhe…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 5, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Free e-book from Scribd: Advanced Issues on Cognitive Science and Semiotics."

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 5, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"From a post by Adam at Knowledge Ecology: "Pansemiosis refers to the position that a…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 5, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"From Balder's 2nd source: On Pierce: "Semiosis in this sense is by no means restrict…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 5, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"This section of my source is interesting: "Peirce held that science suggests that th…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 5, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"As I often do, I turn to the Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy to get a general id…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 5, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Yes, I can see it's similar to Joel's work. I wish he were more intelligible to me s…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 5, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Granted I disagree with MT when it comes to her interpretation of this material, whe…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 5, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"To reiterate a point made above, for humans mhetaoric is not only the embodied metap…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 4, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"I found Bryant's recent blog post interesting on many levels. One is how SR/OOO is p…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Jun 4, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

RSS

What paths lie ahead for religion and spirituality in the 21st Century? How might the insights of modernity and post-modernity impact and inform humanity's ancient wisdom traditions? How are we to enact, together, new spiritual visions – independently, or within our respective traditions – that can respond adequately to the challenges of our times?

This group is for anyone interested in exploring these questions and tracing out the horizons of an integral post-metaphysical spirituality.

Notice to Visitors

At the moment, this site is at full membership capacity and we are not admitting new members.  We are still getting new membership applications, however, so I am considering upgrading to the next level, which will allow for more members to join.  In the meantime, all discussions are open for viewing and we hope you will read and enjoy the content here.

© 2026   Created by Balder.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service