Edward theurj Berge's Discussions (6,956)

Discussions Replied To (6750) Replies Latest Activity

"And this: "In Luhmann's theory the 'human being' is not conceptualised as forming a…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 14, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"In this article Maturana and Varela find cognition to the the element(s) of biologic…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 14, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"From this article on Luhmann: "In looking at psychic systems Luhmann developed a con…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 14, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"I'm still wondering about elements within a suobject. They are obviously not fundame…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 14, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Very well said. It seems OOO has affected you as much as it has me. At least Esbjorn…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 13, 2012 to Opening Space for Translineage Practice

27 Sep 29, 2012
Reply by Edward theurj Berge

"I also like on pp. 9-10 that elements must be ephemeral, for a system cannot store a…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 13, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Hmm, it seems for Luhmann that indeed thoughts are the basic elements in conscious s…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 13, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"I'm not sure yet what exactly he means by elements. Since both Bryant and Wilber use…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 13, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Now one question I have--I have several but for now this one--can the elements of a…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 11, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

"Edwards discusses insentience in Through AQAL Eyes, Part I. This distinction is cont…"

Edward theurj Berge replied Sep 11, 2012 to Object-oriented ontology

1547 Jun 15, 2017
Reply by DavidM58

RSS

What paths lie ahead for religion and spirituality in the 21st Century? How might the insights of modernity and post-modernity impact and inform humanity's ancient wisdom traditions? How are we to enact, together, new spiritual visions – independently, or within our respective traditions – that can respond adequately to the challenges of our times?

This group is for anyone interested in exploring these questions and tracing out the horizons of an integral post-metaphysical spirituality.

Notice to Visitors

At the moment, this site is at full membership capacity and we are not admitting new members.  We are still getting new membership applications, however, so I am considering upgrading to the next level, which will allow for more members to join.  In the meantime, all discussions are open for viewing and we hope you will read and enjoy the content here.

© 2026   Created by Balder.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service