Oleg Linetsky
  • Male
  • Odessa
  • Ukraine
Share on Facebook Share

Oleg Linetsky's Friends

  • Balder

Oleg Linetsky's Discussions

GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
41 Replies

Dear friends,I want to share with you my speech on the IEC2014 conference in Budapest.It's about the absolute truth and wisdom in the Integral framework,about the ontology, Ukrainian crisis and a…Continue

Tags: dzogchen

Started this discussion. Last reply by Layman Pascal Jun 2, 2014.

On open letter to Ken Wilber and integral teachers
38 Replies

Dear friends,recently I wrote my letter to Ken Wilber where I state several ideas important to postmetaphysics discussion as I guess.When I first read "Integral spirituality" several years ago I was…Continue

Tags: experiencing, pure vision, feelings, evolutionary impulse, perennial

Started this discussion. Last reply by Oleg Linetsky Jul 6, 2012.

Gifts Received

Gift

Oleg Linetsky has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Oleg Linetsky's Page

Latest Activity

Layman Pascal replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"I agree -- as per my first response on this topic.  Paraconsistency is definitely a kindred approach but it needs to understand itself a little more profoundly -- following its own tendencies into the multiple interacting ontologies that Wilber…"
Jun 2, 2014
Layman Pascal replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Josephus, I whole-heartedly agree that these "active betwixts" can be articulated as higher-level resolutions or additional dimensions.  My only caution is that dimensions (similar, but the not the same as "emptiness") are…"
Jun 2, 2014
Layman Pascal replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"The notion of a "paraconsistent logic" is necessary in order to create MOA-2 models (and to follow their implied convergence toward MOA-3 models).  I have not read the Priest myself but I concur with Joseph that the function of…"
Jun 2, 2014
Layman Pascal replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Heya Joey ('y' added only for alphabetic consistency with heYa), Nice snag.  Presumably Wilbs (or at least MY Wilbs) would agree that the IOU is issued not only forward toward the necessity of successor holons in an emerging universe…"
May 31, 2014
Edwyrd theurj Burj replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Just another example of how the Lingam is caught in a metaphysical interpretation of paradox. See Balder's recent post linking to Priest's article on paraconsistent logic based on both modern math and Nagarjuna. And the post following…"
May 31, 2014
Balder replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Hi, Oleg, I read your paper over the weekend, as I had said I was going to do.  Since it seems you may have already withdrawn from this conversation, I'll only post an abbreviated response for now.First, yes, I appreciate your emphasis on…"
May 27, 2014
Layman Pascal replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"15-0-6... an apt assemblage for this particular case."
May 25, 2014
Layman Pascal replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Oleg Linestsky is the Enemy of God!   What a vile, wretched & resentful creature full of false sympathies and pretended wisdoms.  How it pains me to recall his foul tone of poisonous snidery and fillipicious prognostications.  A…"
May 24, 2014
Oleg Linetsky replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Bruce, I bring my condolences to you, that you choose to deal with such insanes as layman."
May 24, 2014
Layman Pascal replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"I am afraid I must forgo my usual inclusive attitude to denounce Oleg.  His essay is quite simply the worst thing I have ever read in my entire life.  So heartless and narcissistic.  It appears that he does not understand morality or…"
May 23, 2014
Balder replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Oleg, on my side, I am only responding so far to some of the comments in this thread, since I haven't had a chance to finish reading your paper yet.  So, I'm sorry if it seems I am ignoring your main points; the fact is, I…"
May 23, 2014
Oleg Linetsky replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Bruce, I'm amazed at how some people can be absorbed with wrapping and insignificant details, not seeing the main point. In many respects this confirms the thesis of my presentation. Unfortunately. The irony is that this forum (as the name…"
May 23, 2014
Balder replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Oleg,I think we (meaning Wilber, you, me, any of us) overestimate what Integral Theory is if we assume that, by virtue of having the capacity to "account for" or "have a space for" or even "postmetaphysically…"
May 23, 2014
Oleg Linetsky replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
")))"
May 23, 2014
Layman Pascal replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Oleg, On behalf of all integralists I hereby renounced the word "philosophy" and adopt the term "epistemological eclectic".  However I would note that this eclectic mix is adaptable and can include all moral philosophies. As…"
May 23, 2014
Oleg Linetsky replied to Oleg Linetsky's discussion GNOSIS VS EPISTEME
"Well, it's nice observation. If Wilber didn't declare his approach as 'all-inclusive world philosophy', there wouldn't be any censures. But he did. It means that he insists he included all possible methodologies…"
May 22, 2014

Comment Wall (1 comment)

You need to be a member of Integral Post-Metaphysical Spirituality to add comments!

Join Integral Post-Metaphysical Spirituality

At 7:11am on May 10, 2012, Balder said…

Welcome, Oleg!  I look forward to your participation here, and to discussing your work.

 

All the best,

 

Bruce

 
 
 
What paths lie ahead for religion and spirituality in the 21st Century? How might the insights of modernity and post-modernity impact and inform humanity's ancient wisdom traditions? How are we to enact, together, new spiritual visions – independently, or within our respective traditions – that can respond adequately to the challenges of our times?

This group is for anyone interested in exploring these questions and tracing out the horizons of an integral post-metaphysical spirituality.

Notice to Visitors

At the moment, this site is at full membership capacity and we are not admitting new members.  We are still getting new membership applications, however, so I am considering upgrading to the next level, which will allow for more members to join.  In the meantime, all discussions are open for viewing and we hope you will read and enjoy the content here.

© 2017   Created by Balder.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service