A Secular Age - Integral Post-Metaphysical Spirituality2024-03-29T06:38:29Zhttp://integralpostmetaphysics.ning.com/forum/topics/a-secular-age?commentId=5301756%3AComment%3A45644&feed=yes&xn_auth=noIn exploring Hegel's dialecti…tag:integralpostmetaphysics.ning.com,2013-02-28:5301756:Comment:456442013-02-28T00:18:39.059ZEdward theurj Bergehttp://integralpostmetaphysics.ning.com/profile/theurj
<p>In exploring Hegel's dialectic I was reading recently the <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel/" target="_blank">SEP entry</a> on him. Seems there were 3 main interpretations of his work: traditional metaphysical, post-Kantian nonmetaphysical, revised metaphysical. According to the entry Taylor is in the first class, using as evidence his book <em>Hegel</em>, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. I was interested in how Kennilingam uses Hegel's transcend-and-include logic…</p>
<p>In exploring Hegel's dialectic I was reading recently the <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel/" target="_blank">SEP entry</a> on him. Seems there were 3 main interpretations of his work: traditional metaphysical, post-Kantian nonmetaphysical, revised metaphysical. According to the entry Taylor is in the first class, using as evidence his book <em>Hegel</em>, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. I was interested in how Kennilingam uses Hegel's transcend-and-include logic but found much in common with the two in Hegel's more general metaphysical view. Not surprisingly, Taylor was an extensive source in SES* and has written favorable reviews of his work generally. Would you relate some of Taylor's view in ASA to kennilingus?</p>
<p>E.g., pp. 34, 38, 129, 137, 149, 369, 383, 488, 585, 644, 685, 778</p>